Connect with us

Economy

Marketers, stakeholders, warn against 15% petrol tax suspension

Published

on

• Reversal will trigger rise in forex, says Dr. Yusuf
• Policy is fiscal and market-stabilising instrument, says Prof Iledare

Experts and other stakeholders yesterday warned the country of jeopardisng long term national interests for short term measures. The experts, including economists, oil marketers, chambers of commerce and industry leaders, and other stakeholders, were reacting to the suspension of the of the implementation of the 15 per cent ad valorem import duty on imported Premium Motor Spirit and Diesel by the federal government.
Last week, the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), in a statement posted on its X handle had informed the public of government’s suspension of the implementation of the tax.
“It should also be noted that the implementation of the 15 per cent ad-valorem import duty on imported Premium Motor Spirit and Diesel is no longer in view,” the Director, Public Affairs Department, NMDPRA, George Ene-Ita, said in the post.
“Nigeria must avoid short-term measures that jeopardise long-term national interests. The suspension of the 15 per cent import duty on petroleum products puts at risk energy security; industrialization; foreign exchange stability; job creation; backward integration and national economic sovereignty.
“Therefore, protecting domestic refining capacity is an urgent national imperative. Reinstating protective measures, supporting local refiners, ensuring policy predictability and regulating import volumes are essential steps toward securing Nigeria’s industrial future,” the Chief Executive Officer, Center for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE), Dr. Muda Yusuf, in a statement made available to TheTrustNews.com, yesterday.
For professor of petroleum economics, Prof. Wumi Iledare, the 15 per cent import duty should have been viewed as a fiscal and market-stabilising instrument, not a political gesture.
While some stakeholders see the development as a step in the right direction, yet, others argued that it is a disservice to local refinery, investment in the sector and by extension, a negative for the country’s overall economy.
For the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), the suspension of the tax will affect sector and economy in both the short and long term.
“Well, if we view the suspension for the immediate gain, then we can say it is a good development; but for the future, it is not a good development. The reason is that provided that there is no tax or charges on the imports, our local refineries will not be patronised because their product will be a little bit costlier than imported products,” IPMAN President, Abubakar Maigandi, told TheTrustNews.com in a telephone chat at the weekend.
Yet another oil marketer who pleaded anonymity, agreed that government should go ahead with the implementation of the tax if only for the benefits it offers. These benefits our source listed to include reduced pressure on foreign exchange considering that importation of petroleum products is dollar denominated.
“The truth and reality is that government should implement that 15 per cent tax on petroleum products importation because it will help our economy. The reason why you see Naira now a little bit stable compared to before, is because of the reduction of purchasing outside. And if we want to encourage the Nigerian company, actually we have to, the government has to do that; they have to put that tax.
“This is a reality, but you know people don’t want to hear it, they put politics into it and is not good for our economy. The 15 per cent tax on fuel import will help the indigenous companies or refineries- all these refineries just coming up, people doing business; it will encourage them to do business, an foreign investors too will come into the sector with the needed investment,” the source, a high ranking stakeholder in the oil industry, said.
On fears that there could be fuel shortage as the yuletide approaches if the policy is implemented, the CPPE boss argued that while domestic refineries are expected to meet national demand within a short horizon, temporary supply gaps should be addressed not by dismantling protective measures but through guided, quota-based importation to supplement domestic output.
Yusuf noted that the suspension of the 15 per cent import duty on petrol and diesel carries profound implications for domestic refining, investment confidence, macroeconomic stability and the long-term competitiveness of the petroleum downstream sector.
He called for the reinstatement of the tax which he described as “essential to restoring competitive balance and safeguarding domestic refining investments.” According to him, the policy was aimed to serve as an industrial protection instrument designed to support emerging private refineries; promote backward integration and industrial development; ensure a level playing field for domestic producers; conserve scarce foreign exchange; protect jobs, stimulate local value addition; reduce exposure to global supply instability and encourage long-term investments in refining and petrochemicals
These objectives, laudable as they are, are now being threatened with the policy suspension. For instance, Dr. Yusuf noted that investors, including the Dangote Refinery and other modular refinery operators, made multi-billion-dollar commitments based on policy stability and the assurance of an environment that rewards local production. Therefore, he argued, suspending the duty undermines this protective framework and exposes domestic refiners to inequitable competition from importers benefiting from vastly superior international conditions.
According to the CPPE boss, local refiners operate within a high-cost environment shaped by expensive energy and self-generation; infrastructure gaps and logistics bottlenecks; high cost of capital; security-related risks and inefficiencies in ports and transport systems. These structural disadvantages, he argued, make parity with imported products impossible without protective measures.
He warned that reverting to heavy import dependence reopens vulnerabilities to global price volatility, geopolitical disruptions and supply insecurity- the same conditions that previously collapsed public refineries and created a fiscally ruinous subsidy regime.
Yusuf, an economist, equally agreed that petroleum importation is one of Nigeria’s largest consumers of foreign exchange. Consequently, he explained that increased imports of the product will heighten pressure on the naira; fuel inflation through exchange-rate pass-through; deepen balance-of-payments deficits and undermine macroeconomic stability.
This, he said will further come with loss of jobs and industrial value chains given that domestic refining stimulates broad value-chain activities in petrochemicals; plastics; logistics and transport; engineering services and fabrication and construction. Therefore, having an unrestrained importation effectively exports these jobs and opportunities to foreign economies.
The CPPE warned that frequent policy reversals weaken investor sentiment across the economy including refining and downstream operations; domestic manufacturing; financial institutions and global investment partners.
“Undermining confidence at this stage threatens the viability of transformational national assets such as the Dangote Refinery and modular refineries,” Dr. Yusuf said.
Justifying the need to protect indigenous firms, the CPPE boss explained that fair competition requires comparable operating conditions. He enumerated the challenges faced by Nigerian refiners to include infrastructure deficits; higher finance costs; insecure operating environments; elevated logistics costs and demurrage and weak transport and storage systems.
“Importers face none of these disadvantages. Without protective measures, domestic refiners operate at a structural disadvantage. The Dangote Refinery and emerging modular refineries are transformative national assets. Safeguarding them aligns squarely with Nigeria’s long-term economic and strategic goals,” the CPPE said.
He cited major economies that protects their strategic industries to include the United States which jealously guards her steel, agriculture, aviation, energy sectors; European Union which protects its manufacturing, agriculture, pharmaceuticals; India guards her refining and petrochemicals and China, which devised a comprehensive industrial policy to protect local capacity.
“Nigeria already maintains an Import Adjustment Tax List for strategic sectors such as agro allied, cement, sugar, steel, pharmaceuticals and automobiles. Therefore, extending similar protection to domestic refining is both logical and necessary,” Dr. Yusuf said.
He further argued that there exists a false dichotomy between domestic refining and price stability. “Strengthening refining capacity and moderating fuel prices are not mutually exclusive. With the right policy mix—including fiscal incentives, logistics support, transparent pricing and guided importation, Nigeria can achieve both goals simultaneously, because domestic refining, over the long term, reduces costs by limiting forex exposure, import-related logistics and premiums associated with global volatility,” Dr. Yusuf said.
In similar vein, the Ogun State Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (OGUNCCIMA) also faulted the Federal Government’s decision to suspend the proposed implementation of the 15 per cent import duty on petrol and diesel imports. It insisted that the rescinding of the policy could slow down the nation’s progress toward energy independence and weaken investor confidence in the refining sector.
“The suspension of the 15 per cent fuel import tariff is disappointing. The policy was a step in the right direction to promote local refining, reduce dependence on imports, conserve foreign exchange and create a fair competitive environment for domestic producers. Its reversal sends a wrong signal to investors who have shown confidence in Nigeria’s energy sector,” OGUNCCIMA’s President, Niyi Oshiyemi, said.
A professor of petroleum economics, Prof. Wumi Iledare, argued that the 15 per cent import duty should have been viewed as a fiscal and market-stabilising instrument, not a political gesture.
“The intent is clear — to protect emerging local refineries, encourage domestic value addition, and gradually align Nigeria’s downstream market with its growing industrial capacity. In economic terms, this policy aimed to reduce import dependence, conserve foreign exchange, and support refinery viability. Domestic producers like Dangote Refinery and the rehabilitated NNPC plants need a short breathing space to stabilise operations and recover heavy capital investments. Many countries have used such temporary tariffs to nurture new industries.
“Of course, prices may rise slightly in the short term — but that’s part of the transition toward long-term efficiency where Nigeria meets its own fuel needs competitively. Let’s keep things in perspective: petrol here sells around N890–N965 per litre, while in Benin N1,800–N1,875, Togo N1,835, Ghana N1,550–N1,995, and Senegal N2,538. Nigeria still remains the lowest-priced market in the sub-region. The task now is ensuring border vigilance and market discipline to prevent arbitrage,” he contended.

Economy

Monetary tightening will hurt investment in real economy, says Dr. Yusuf

Published

on

• Food, transportation spike inflation in March

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE), yesterday warned against the current inflationary pressures are predominantly cost-push in nature, driven by energy, logistics and structural inefficiencies and not excess demand.
The Group, a policy and economic think-tank body, therefore cautioned against using the recent uptick in inflation as a basis for additional monetary tightening. It noted that further monetary tightening would be ineffective in addressing the root causes of inflation, high interest rates would hurt economic growth, investment and productivity; while the real sector would face increased financing constraints, undermining recovery efforts.
Reacting to the March Consumer Price Index (CPI) report released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the CPPE boss, Dr. Muda Yusuf, described as worrisome the latest inflation data, describing it as a signaling a worrying resurgence of inflationary pressures, particularly on a month-on-month basis.
He said that while recent months have reflected a gradual moderation in year-on-year inflation, the release of the March CPI report gives a cause for concern given that headline inflation edged up to 15.38 per cent in March, while month-on-month inflation accelerated sharply to 4.18 per cent, nearly double the level recorded in February.
This development, Yusuf argued, underscores the fragility of the disinflation process and raises concerns about renewed cost pressures in the economy.
“The March 2026 CPI report highlights a critical development in Nigeria’s inflation trajectory, where the earlier gains in disinflation are now being threatened by a resurgence of cost-driven pressures, particularly from energy, food and transportation.
“This emerging trend suggests that while inflation had been moderating on a year-on-year basis, underlying structural vulnerabilities remain largely unresolved, with recent month-on-month increases pointing to renewed price momentum.
“The situation calls for urgent and targeted policy responses, as failure to address these supply-side drivers could reverse the fragile stability achieved and deepen the cost-of-living challenges facing households and businesses.
“While disinflation trends remain evident on a year-on-year basis, the resurgence of monthly inflation pressures signals that macroeconomic stability is still fragile. The policy response must therefore shift from a narrow focus on monetary tools to a broader strategy that addresses the structural drivers of inflation, particularly in energy, food and transportation.
“Without decisive action in these areas, the gains recorded in inflation moderation may prove temporary, while households and businesses continue to grapple with significant cost pressures,” Yusuf said.
Yusuf, who also doubles as the Chief Executive Officer, Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE), noted that the recent uptick in inflation is largely reflective of renewed energy price pressures, which continue to permeate production, transportation and distribution costs across the economy.
Insisting that energy remains a critical cost driver in the country, given the persistent reliance on gas, diesel and petrol for power generation, logistics and industrial operations, Yusuf noted the implications of the development as “far-reaching.” Specifically, he pointed out that rising energy costs are quickly transmitted into higher transportation costs; increased food prices and escalating production and distribution expenses.
“This cost-push dynamic explains the sharp increase in month-on-month inflation and signals that the underlying inflationary pressures are far from subdued,” Dr. Yusuf explained.
Analysing the CPI data, the CPPE boss noted that it clearly shows that food and transportation-related costs remain the most significant contributors to inflation, accounting for a substantial proportion which is estimated at about 70 per cent of inflationary pressures when direct and indirect effects are considered.
From the data, food inflation stood at 14.31 per cent year-on-year, while core inflation—which captures broader price pressures—rose to 16.21 per cent. On the other hand, transportation costs, which are heavily influenced by fuel prices and logistics inefficiencies, exerted strong upward pressure on prices across sectors as higher transport costs raise the cost of moving food, goods and services nationwide, thereby amplifying inflation.
“These figures are particularly troubling given their direct impact on household welfare. The dominance of food and transport in the inflation basket has profound welfare consequences. These are non-discretionary expenditures, meaning households cannot easily adjust consumption in response to rising prices,” Dr. Yusuf said, adding that the situation is even more concerning given that rural inflation remains elevated, reflecting structural challenges in agricultural productivity and distribution systems.
The implications of these is the erosion of real incomes and purchasing power; rising cost of living pressures on households; increased poverty and vulnerability, particularly in rural areas and heightened inequality across regions and income groups.
The CPPE admonished that given the centrality of food and transportation to inflation and welfare, governments at both federal and subnational levels should prioritise interventions in these sectors.
For instance, in agricultural productivity, there is an urgent need to improve security in farming communities, strengthen rural infrastructure and logistics, enhance access to inputs and financing and promote mechanisation and modern farming techniques.
“Boosting agricultural productivity is the most sustainable pathway to moderating food inflation, not importation. Besides, governments at all levels should invest significantly in mass transit systems, bus and rail, reduce reliance on fragmented private transport systems, introduce regulatory frameworks to curb exploitative pricing and improve urban mobility infrastructure. A more structured and efficient public transport system will significantly reduce inflationary pressures and improve welfare outcomes,” Dr. Yusuf noted.

Continue Reading

Economy

World Bank: Nigerian economy to grow in H1

Published

on

Nigeria’s economy is resilient and set to grow in the first half of 2026 despite the Iran war, the World ‌Bank has said.

It however said that rising fuel costs and persistently high inflation risk squeezing incomes and slowing poverty reduction.

The bank also advised Nigeria to remove controls on fuel imports to ease inflation and support growth.

 

Business activity remains in expansion territory with the U.S./Israel-Iran conflict so far lifting prices but leaving output largely intact, World Bank Nigeria lead economist FisehaHaile said during a presentation in the capital Abuja.

 

“Overall business activity has been expanding over the past fewmonths, suggesting the impact on growth has been relatively contained. But the shock is still ⁠being felt through higher inflation,” Haile said.

 

President Bola Tinubu, now in his third year in office, has rolled outNigeria’s most ambitious economic overhaul in decades by ending costly fuel and energy subsidies, devaluing the currency and changing the tax system to stabilise an economy battered by high inflation, currency weakness and external shocks.

 

Inflation eased sharply to 15.06 per cent in February from around 33 per cent in December 2024, but remains high compared with regional peers and has come under renewed pressure since the Middle East conflict began, Haile said.

 

Fuel prices have risen more than 50 per cent during the Iran war, feeding into transport, food and production costs. Nigeria should consider lifting curbs on fuel imports to help ease inflation, he said.

 

“Inflation is still elevated and under ‌increasing ⁠pressure, and that poses risks to incomes and poverty reduction,” Haile said.

Nigeria’s external buffers have improved as foreign exchange reserves rise and volatility eases, but tighter global financing conditions still threaten inflows, borrowing costs, and remittances.

 

Nigeria’s fiscal deficit widened slightly to 3.1 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2025, but remains lower than in pre-reform years, Haile said, adding that the debt‑to‑GDP ratio fell for the first time in a decade, helped ⁠by stronger fiscal performance and exchange rate valuation gains.

 

The World Bank forecasts economic growth of about 4.2 per cent for 2026 and urged authorities to save windfalls from higher oil prices, keep monetary policy tight, and avoid blanket subsidies to rein in inflation.

 

Continue Reading

Economy

$1tr Economy: Nigeria to understudy Indonesia’s $1.4tr model

Published

on

The Federal Government has said Nigeria is looking to learn from Indonesia’s transformation into a $1.4 trillion economy as it pursues its own ambition of building a $1 trillion economy under the administration of Bola Tinubu.

A statement from the ministry on Tuesday said the Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Senator Abubakar Bagudu, made the disclosure when Indonesia’s Ambassador to Nigeria, Bambang Suharto, paid a courtesy visit to the ministry in Abuja to deepen discussions on economic cooperation and development partnerships.

Bagudu said Nigeria is particularly interested in how Indonesia achieved such rapid economic growth, noting that the country’s experience offers useful lessons as Nigeria moves ahead with its 2026–2030 National Development Plan.

“Indonesia remains a vital partner for Nigeria as we strive for inclusive growth and economic transformation. There is much we can accomplish together through shared knowledge, investment, and innovation,” he said.

The minister added that achieving Nigeria’s $1 trillion economy target would depend largely on private sector participation and stronger collaboration with international partners.

Also speaking, Minister of State for Budget and Economic Planning, Dr. Doris Uzoka-Anite, said Nigeria and Indonesia share cultural and economic similarities that can support deeper cooperation. She called for stronger engagement and better knowledge exchange to turn opportunities between both countries into real economic gains.

Earlier, the Permanent Secretary of the ministry, Deborah Odoh, described the visit as a sign of the long-standing relationship between both countries. She said Indonesia’s progress in governance, economic diversification and public sector reforms provides practical lessons Nigeria can adopt.

According to her, the engagement offers an opportunity to strengthen institutional collaboration and identify workable solutions that can drive inclusive growth, especially among countries in the Global South.

In his remarks, Ambassador Suharto said Indonesia remains committed to strengthening its relationship with Nigeria across key sectors.

He pointed to ongoing cooperation in agriculture, including livestock development projects in Sokoto State and Kebbi State, as well as growing partnerships in the pharmaceutical sector, where Indonesian companies are setting up manufacturing facilities in Lagos.

The ambassador also disclosed plans to expand cooperation into strategic industries such as aviation and maritime services, including the development of Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul facilities to position Nigeria as a regional hub.

Both countries agreed to strengthen their cooperation frameworks, expand investment opportunities and build stronger partnerships aimed at supporting sustainable economic growth.

Continue Reading

Trending